Did She or Didn't She?

(6)

I saw an interesting piece on the web recently which fitted with one of the subjects for tonight, 'The wet pants look.' The piece in question featured the picture of a female with a 'camel toe.' She was wearing jeans. It seemed to me at the time that the 'camel toe photo' was somewhat contrived: would not a blue jeans camel toe be actually painful to pull off? Maybe not. I could only speculate, not having the required equipment.

Then there was the recent piece on the national news to the effect that women's jeans had recently acquired a more modest waist line - above the pubic level. I applauded the idea. But then one day it hit me that my taste in women's jeans might be of interest to this blog. So here is my idea for a new sexy look for women's jeans:

Dye those jeans such that they suggest the possibility that the female wearer has wet her pants. The jeans in question should exhibit appropriate sublty - no garish butt outlines, only the suggestion of darker, wetter material between her legs viewed from the rear. The impression should be one of... uncertainty: did she or didn't she?

I claim that such a jean, subtly and appropriately marketed, would be a winner.