The Plan

Blogger seems to be working normally for the first time today. My post are published within seconds.

Back to Goodman. I first met this son-of-a-bitch on September 12, 1995. I had complained to one of the ACSD 'desk sargeants' about harrassment, and he sent me to see a detective Paul E. Goodman Jr. I did not realize it at the time, but Goodman was literally 'waiting for me.' First some 'background:'

When the first anti-stalking laws were passed in '92, the fish must have realized that his favorite hobby would eventually be outlawed in Colorado. He knew I would eventually go to the police, and so he 'cultivated' Goodman (tap) and possibly others at the ACSD. Money is very good fertilizer, and the fish's crop responded accordingly. When I finally sought help from the ACSD, Goodman was there to 'help.' I had no idea what to expect, and the interview process was a revelation. Nor did I suspect that the fish had already corrupted Goodman.

Goodman and a fella named Kirby Hodgkin interviewed me in their 'interview room.' They both took notes as I spoke. I remember the conversation vaguely. I remember that I was somewhat hungover that day, and could have chosen a better day. But it wouldn't have mattered. Goodman would have done his hatchet job in any case. As I read Goodman's notes now, they read like the ravings of a madman (tap). The notes are typewritten, and photocopies of what appear to be hurriedly scribbled notes are attached to the typewritten pages. There is no way to tell whether the notes are 'remanufactured' from the originals or whether they are indeed the originals. I suspect they were 'remanufactured' in order to make me seem as crazy as possible and that it was part of 'the plan.'

Several features of the notes point to this, one in particular. I remember telling Goodman that I played three games with the fish the first time I met him at the DCC. Goodman's notes mention one game and that the fish was not pleased with losing that game. I did not say that. So in this particular case the notes are inaccurate, and may be a clue that the notes were 'edited.' Another error has events years out of sequence.